Operational Resilience Framework: Pillars, Guidance, Steps

Operational resilience is the disciplined way an organization keeps its most important services running—and restores them quickly—when things go wrong. An operational resilience framework turns that goal into action. It aligns people, processes, technology, data, and third parties; defines what must be protected; sets clear impact tolerances; and prescribes roles, playbooks, and metrics so you can withstand, adapt to, and recover from cyberattacks, outages, vendor failures, extreme weather, and human error.

This guide gives you a practical blueprint. You’ll get a plain‑English overview of the pillars of an operational resilience framework, how it differs from business continuity and disaster recovery, and the regulatory standards that matter (OCC/Fed, FCA/BoE/PRA, BCBS, DORA, NIST, ISO). Then we’ll walk step‑by‑step through building your program: defining important business services, setting impact tolerances, mapping dependencies, testing scenarios, establishing metrics and governance, hardening communications, planning resourcing, and avoiding common pitfalls.

Why operational resilience matters now

Disruptions are more frequent and costlier: cyberattacks, outages, third‑party failures, and extreme weather routinely hit operations. IBM pegs the 2023 average data‑breach cost at $4.45M. At the same time, regulators have raised the bar. US banking agencies (OCC/Fed), the UK’s FCA/BoE/PRA policies, the Basel Committee principles, and the EU’s DORA all spotlight operational resilience, shifting focus from prevention alone to demonstrating you can deliver critical services within defined impact tolerances and recover quickly. Customers expect always‑on services—so a robust operational resilience framework protects revenue, trust, and compliance.

Operational resilience versus business continuity and disaster recovery

Operational resilience is not the same as business continuity (BC) or disaster recovery (DR). BC is the playbook you run after an incident to keep business functions going; DR restores IT systems and data. An operational resilience framework is broader and proactive: it defines important business services, sets impact tolerances, maps dependencies (including third parties), and coordinates detect‑protect‑respond‑recover capabilities so you can deliver critical services during disruption, demonstrate you stayed within tolerances, and satisfy rising regulatory expectations.

Pillars of an operational resilience framework

The strongest operational resilience frameworks turn strategy into repeatable habits. They clarify what truly matters, how much disruption you can tolerate, which dependencies could fail, and how you’ll keep delivering under stress. They also codify testing, decision rights, and metrics so you can prove performance and continuously improve.

• Important business services (IBS): Prioritize services where disruption harms customers, markets, or safety.
• Impact tolerances and metrics: Set time/volume/value thresholds and track leading indicators.
• Dependency mapping: Trace people, processes, tech, data, sites, and third/fourth parties.
• ICT/cyber and ops controls: Align to Identify–Detect–Protect–Respond–Recover capabilities.
• BC/DR integration: Maintain playbooks, failover paths, and tested, recoverable backups.
• Incident management and communications: Define roles, authority, and stakeholder messaging.
• Scenario testing and governance: Run exercises, review results at the board, and improve.

Regulatory guidance and standards to know (OCC/Fed, FCA/BoE/PRA, BCBS, DORA, NIST, ISO)

Across jurisdictions, regulators converge on a simple idea: assume disruptions will occur and prove you can deliver critical services within defined tolerances. If your footprint spans regions, your operational resilience framework will likely map to several references at once. Common threads: identify important services, set impact tolerances, map dependencies, test plausible scenarios, and evidence governance and recovery.

• OCC/Fed (US): “Sound Practices to Strengthen Operational Resilience” stresses delivering critical operations “from any hazard,” with governance, third‑party risk, incident management, and testing.
• FCA/BoE/PRA (UK): PS21/3 and PS6/21 require important business services, impact tolerances, dependency mapping, and scenario testing.
• BCBS: Seven principles cover governance, operational risk, BCP/testing, interconnection mapping, third‑party dependencies, incident management, and resilient ICT.
• DORA (EU): Standardizes ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, third‑party oversight, and demonstrating continuity through cyber incidents.
• NIST/ISO: Apply NIST CSF’s Identify–Detect–Protect–Respond–Recover and ISO‑aligned controls; industry ORF efforts align with both.

Step-by-step: how to build your operational resilience framework

Use this sequence to stand up an operational resilience framework that satisfies regulators and works in production. Treat it as a cross‑functional program with clear owners, documented outputs, and auditable evidence. Each step delivers artifacts you’ll reuse in exercises, incidents, and board reporting.

• Secure sponsorship and scope: Confirm executive owner, objectives, in/out of scope, and decision rights.
• Define important services: Prioritize customer‑ and market‑facing services first.
• Set impact tolerances and KRIs: Establish time, volume, and value thresholds.
• Map dependencies end‑to‑end: Include people, tech, data, facilities, and third/fourth parties.
• Assess and remediate controls: Align ICT/cyber, BC/DR, and incident response gaps.
• Design response and communications: Roles, playbooks, stakeholder messaging.
• Plan and run scenarios: Test plausible severe events; document lessons and fixes.
• Metrics, reporting, governance: Dashboards, forums, and continuous improvement cadence.

Next, start with services and tolerances—the foundation for everything that follows.

Define important business services and set impact tolerances

Within your operational resilience framework, begin by naming the services where failure would materially harm customers, markets, or safety—your important business services (IBS), also called critical economic functions. Score candidates by customer outcomes, revenue exposure, and regulatory obligations. Validate selections with the front line to reflect real operations, then lock scope, owners, and accountability at the executive level; this foundation drives tolerances, testing, remediation, and investment.

• Define criteria: Customer harm, market/system impact, safety, and compliance obligations.
• Set tolerances per IBS: Maximum time to recover, maximum volume affected, and value-at-risk thresholds.
• Pick KRIs and rules: Leading indicators plus measurement, reporting, and escalation triggers.
• Approve and evidence: Executive sign‑off and documentation to demonstrate staying within tolerances during scenario tests.

Map dependencies, third parties, and supply chain risk

With important business services set, map upstream and downstream dependencies across people, processes, technology, data, facilities, and external providers. Create a single, relational view that ties each component to each service to expose single points of failure, concentration risk, and fourth‑party exposure. Leading guidance (BCBS, FCA/BoE/PRA, OCC/Fed) expects this mapping and it becomes the backbone for impact tolerances, scenario design, and remediation plans.

• Build a relational inventory: Link assets and owners to each service, interfaces, sites, and environments.
• Classify criticality and failure modes: Note workarounds and minimum viable service levels per dependency.
• Extend to third/fourth parties: Use a risk‑based, proportionate approach for due diligence and ongoing monitoring.
• Harden agreements and signals: Require resilience testing evidence, incident notification, recovery commitments, and operational KRIs.

Plan and run scenario testing and exercises

Scenario testing proves whether your operational resilience framework can keep important services within impact tolerances under real stress. Regulators (OCC/Fed, FCA/BoE/PRA, BCBS, DORA) expect plausible‑but‑severe scenarios, evidence of execution, and remediation. Use your IBS list and dependency maps to choose scenarios that attack real failure points, including communications and third‑party outages, and coordinate tests across BCM/DR, SOC, ops, and the front line.

• Set objectives and success criteria: Tie to tolerances (RTO, RPO, MTTR, customer/volume limits).
• Pick a scenario set: Ransomware, cloud region loss, telecom/communications outage, key vendor failure, site inaccessibility, data corruption.
• Mix formats: Tabletop (decision rights), technical simulations, failover drills, and time‑boxed walk‑throughs.
• Exercise communications: Practice internal/external messaging and regulator notifications.
• Measure what matters: Detection, containment, recovery times, volumes impacted, and minimum viable service delivered.
• Close the loop: Capture findings, assign owners/deadlines, update playbooks, and re‑test to verify fixes.

Metrics, reporting, and governance

Metrics turn impact tolerances into day‑to‑day management. Build dashboards by important business service, tie measures to NIST CSF functions (Identify–Detect–Protect–Respond–Recover), and prove performance over time. Regulators (OCC/Fed, FCA/BoE/PRA, BCBS, DORA) expect evidence: trends, scenario results, third‑party performance, and clear oversight. Establish a governance cadence where executives review resilience risks, accept residuals, and track remediation to closure—with independent challenge from risk and audit.

• Service scorecards: RTO, RPO, MTTR, volumes/customers impacted, minimum viable service achieved.
• Leading KRIs: Patch latency, change failure rate, capacity headroom, control test pass rate, vendor SLA adherence.
• Escalation: Thresholds, pager duty/war room triggers, regulator notification criteria.
• Governance artifacts: Charter, decision rights, risk acceptance records, scenario outcomes, action owners/dates, re‑test evidence.

Build resilient communications into your response

In most incidents, confusion spreads faster than facts. Resilient communications ensure decisions, status, and customer updates flow even if primary channels fail, helping you stay within impact tolerances and meet regulatory expectations. Treat communications as a dependency: design for redundancy, clarity, authority, and evidence—and test during telecom outages.

• Stakeholder map and RACI: execs, operations, regulators, customers, media.
• Multi-channel redundancy: email/SMS/voice, collaboration, push‑to‑talk radio/satellite.
• Pre‑approved templates and authority: regulator notices, customer updates, holding statements; single source of truth and time‑stamped logs.

Implementation roadmap and resourcing

Treat implementation as a program with crisp phases, owners, and evidence. Start lean, prove value fast, and scale. Use your important business services to sequence work and funding for your operational resilience framework while meeting regulator expectations and protecting customers.

• Mobilize (0–4 weeks): sponsor, PMO, scope, governance, templates, tooling.
• Baseline (4–12): identify services, set tolerances, map dependencies, quick wins.
• Prove & remediate (12–24): run scenarios, validate BC/DR, fix gaps, secure vendor commitments.
• Resourcing: small core team (program lead, service owners, BCM/DR, cyber/IT ops, vendor risk, legal/comms) plus SMEs; budget for mapping, exercises, and redundant communications (e.g., push‑to‑talk, SMS, satellite).

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

Most failures aren’t technical—they’re about clarity, scope, and evidence. Programs falter when important services are chosen from org charts, tolerances aren’t measurable, dependency maps ignore third/fourth parties, tests stop at tabletops, communications collapse, and governance produces “shelfware” reports without remediation or re‑tests. Avoid these traps with disciplined, auditable habits.

• Wrong services: Validate with front line and customers.
• Vague tolerances: Define KRIs/KPIs, thresholds, escalation.
• Shallow mapping: Include people, tech, data, facilities, third/fourth parties.
• Testing theater: Run severe end‑to‑end scenarios; re‑test fixes.
• Fragile comms: Build multi‑channel redundancy and pre‑approved templates.

Key takeaways and next steps

Operational resilience becomes real when you name your important business services, set hard impact tolerances, map what they depend on, and prove—through scenarios—that you can deliver under stress. Wrap that with metrics, governance, and resilient communications, and you’ll meet expectations from OCC/Fed, FCA/BoE/PRA, BCBS, DORA, and NIST/ISO while protecting customers and revenue.

• Assign ownership: Appoint an executive sponsor and service owners this week.
• Start with three services: Define IBS, then set tolerances and KRIs.
• Map dependencies: Include third/fourth parties and minimum viable service.
• Test and fix: Run one severe scenario, remediate, and re‑test.
• Harden communications: Add redundant channels and pre‑approved templates.

If dependable field comms are part of your plan, explore nationwide push‑to‑talk options with PeakPTT.